↓ Skip to main content

Application of next-generation sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of human preimplantation embryos

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#45 of 400)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Application of next-generation sequencing for 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening of human preimplantation embryos
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13039-015-0143-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haiyan Zheng, Hua Jin, Lian Liu, Jianqiao Liu, Wei-Hua Wang

Abstract

Aneuploidy is a leading cause of repeat implantation failure and recurrent miscarriages. Preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) enables the assessment of the numeral and structural chromosomal errors of embryos before transfer in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) has been demonstrated to be an accurate PGS method and in present thought to be the gold standard, but new technologies, such as next-generation sequencing (NGS), continue to emerge. Validation of the new comprehensive NGS-based 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening technology is still needed to determine the preclinical accuracy before it might be considered as an alternative method for human PGS. In the present study, 43 human trophectoderm (TE) biopsy samples and 5 cytogenetically characterized cell lines (Coriell Cell Repositories) were tested. The same whole genome amplified product of each sample was blindly assessed with Veriseq NGS and Agilent aCGH to identify the aneuploidy status. The result showed that the NGS identified all abnormalities identified in aCGH including the numeral chromosomal abnormalities (again or loss) in the embryo samples and the structural (partial deletion and duplication) in the Coriell cell lines. Both technologies can identify a segmental imbalance as small as 1.8 Mb in size. Among the 41 TE samples with abnormal karyotypes in this study, eight (19.5 %) samples presented as multiple chromosome abnormalities. The abnormalities occurred to almost all chromosomes, except chromosome 6, 7, 17 and Y chromosome. Given its reliability and high level of consistency with an established aCGH methodology, NGS has demonstrated a robust high-throughput methodology ready for extensive clinical application in reproductive medicine, with potential advantages of reduced costs and enhanced precision. Then, a randomized controlled clinical trial confirming its clinical effectiveness is advisable to obtain a larger sequencing dataset and more evidence for the extensive use of NGS-based PGS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 104 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Other 9 8%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 19%
Engineering 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 23 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,794,351
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#45
of 400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,782
of 239,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.