↓ Skip to main content

Family Support in Assertive Community Treatment: An Analysis of Client Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Family Support in Assertive Community Treatment: An Analysis of Client Outcomes
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10597-011-9444-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tamaki Sono, Iwao Oshima, Junichiro Ito, Masaaki Nishio, Yuriko Suzuki, Kentaro Horiuchi, Nobuyuki Niekawa, Masayo Ogawa, Yutaro Setoya, Kazumi Tsukada

Abstract

Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is an outreach-based case management model that assists people with severe mental illness through an intensive and integrated approach. In this program, a multidisciplinary team provides medical and psychosocial services. The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of the following two ACT intervention strategies: "replacement" (supporting the clients) versus "backup" (supporting family members who provide care to clients). Admission days, psychiatric symptoms, quality of life, self-efficacy, and service satisfaction ware evaluated as outcome variables. To identify effective methods of supporting family members, clients living with family were divided into two groups based on the amount and types of services received-the backup group and the replacement group. ANCOVA was used to compare the outcomes between the two groups. The replacement group displayed significantly better psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, self-efficacy, and service satisfaction scores. No differences in admission days or quality of life were found. Clients provided more support directly to clients themselves than to family members was found to have better client outcomes in improving psychiatric symptoms, social functioning, and self-efficacy, resulting in higher levels of service satisfaction. This indicates that society should reduce the responsibility of the family and share responsibility for the care of people with mental illness to effectively improve outcomes for people with mental illnesses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 136 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 18%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 9 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 27 20%
Unknown 34 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 23%
Psychology 30 22%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#818
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,706
of 136,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#12
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.