You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers (INWORKS): an international cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Haematology, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2352-3026(15)00094-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klervi Leuraud, David B Richardson, Elisabeth Cardis, Robert D Daniels, Michael Gillies, Jacqueline A O'Hagan, Ghassan B Hamra, Richard Haylock, Dominique Laurier, Monika Moissonnier, Mary K Schubauer-Berigan, Isabelle Thierry-Chef, Ausrele Kesminiene |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 552 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 145 | 26% |
| United States | 14 | 3% |
| Germany | 12 | 2% |
| Spain | 9 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Australia | 6 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 4 | <1% |
| Czechia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 29 | 5% |
| Unknown | 320 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 524 | 95% |
| Scientists | 11 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 179 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 179 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 7% |
| Researcher | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 124 | 69% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 130 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 572. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,146
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Haematology
#7
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340
of 279,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Haematology
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.