↓ Skip to main content

Research in mosquito control: current challenges for a brighter future

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research in mosquito control: current challenges for a brighter future
Published in
Parasitology Research, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4586-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Benelli

Abstract

Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are a key threat for millions of people worldwide, since they act as vectors for devastating pathogens and parasites. In this scenario, vector control is crucial. Mosquito larvae are usually targeted using organophosphates, insect growth regulators, and microbial agents. Indoor residual spraying and insecticide-treated bed nets are also employed. However, these chemicals have negative effects on human health and the environment and induce resistance in a number of vectors. Newer and safer tools have been recently implemented to enhance control of mosquitoes. Here, I focus on some crucial challenges about eco-friendly control of mosquito vectors, mainly the improvement of behavior-based control strategies (sterile insect technique ("SIT") and "boosted SIT") and plant-borne mosquitocidals, including green-synthesized nanoparticles. A number of hot areas that need further research and cooperation among parasitologists, entomologists, and behavioral ecologists are highlighted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Slovakia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 331 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Master 46 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 13%
Researcher 37 11%
Other 17 5%
Other 47 14%
Unknown 96 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 83 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 10%
Environmental Science 19 6%
Chemistry 16 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 4%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 111 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,627,659
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#187
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,362
of 264,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#5
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,243 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.