↓ Skip to main content

Futures Perfect and Visioneering: a Re-Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in NanoEthics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Futures Perfect and Visioneering: a Re-Assessment
Published in
NanoEthics, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11569-017-0303-8
Authors

William Patrick McCray

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 33%
Professor 3 20%
Researcher 3 20%
Lecturer 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 27%
Arts and Humanities 2 13%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 13%
Computer Science 2 13%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Other 3 20%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2018.
All research outputs
#15,677,717
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from NanoEthics
#144
of 257 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,355
of 321,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NanoEthics
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 257 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.