↓ Skip to main content

Abnormal modulation of reward versus punishment learning by a dopamine D2-receptor antagonist in pathological gamblers

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abnormal modulation of reward versus punishment learning by a dopamine D2-receptor antagonist in pathological gamblers
Published in
Psychopharmacology, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00213-015-3986-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieneke Katharina Janssen, Guillaume Sescousse, Mahur Melina Hashemi, Monique Harmina Maria Timmer, Niels Peter ter Huurne, Dirk Everdina Maria Geurts, Roshan Cools

Abstract

Pathological gambling has been associated with dopamine transmission abnormalities, in particular dopamine D2-receptor deficiency, and reversal learning deficits. Moreover, pervasive theoretical accounts suggest a key role for dopamine in reversal learning. However, there is no empirical evidence for a direct link between dopamine, reversal learning and pathological gambling. The aim of the present study is to triangulate dopamine, reversal learning, and pathological gambling. Here, we assess the hypothesis that pathological gambling is accompanied by dopamine-related problems with learning from reward and punishment by investigating effects of the dopamine D2-receptor antagonist sulpiride (400 mg) on reward- and punishment-based reversal learning in 18 pathological gamblers and 22 healthy controls, using a placebo-controlled, double-blind, counter-balanced design. In line with previous studies, blockade of D2 receptors with sulpiride impaired reward versus punishment reversal learning in controls. By contrast, sulpiride did not have any outcome-specific effects in gamblers. These data demonstrate that pathological gambling is associated with a dopamine-related anomaly in reversal learning from reward and punishment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 24 24%
Neuroscience 20 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2017.
All research outputs
#2,452,904
of 23,738,567 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#588
of 5,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,616
of 265,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#4
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,738,567 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,436 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.