↓ Skip to main content

YY super sperm lead to all male triploids and tetraploids

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomic Data, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
YY super sperm lead to all male triploids and tetraploids
Published in
BMC Genomic Data, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12863-015-0230-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rong Zhou, Jun Xiao, Qinbo Qin, Bin Zhu, Rurong Zhao, Chun Zhang, Min Tao, Kaikun Luo, Jing Wang, Liangyue Peng, Shaojun Liu

Abstract

Androgenesis is a unique and rarely encountered reproductive mode in which the offspring only inherit the paternal nuclear genome, resulting in relatively few viable individuals. In this study, a super male (YY) crucian carp was obtained by androgenesis with the diploid sperm of autotetraploid crucian carp (4n = 200). Flow cytometry assay confirmed the fish was diploid. The scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry analysis results of sperm revealed that the YY crucian carp produced unreduced diploid sperm. To prove the special reproductive characteristic and homozygosity of the YY crucian carp, three rounds of hybridization experiments were performed. First, self-crossing between female androgenic progenies and YY crucian carp generated all male tetraploids. Then, hybridization of female red crucian carp (2n = 100) and female autotetraploid fish (4n = 200) with YY crucian carp produced all male triploids and all male tetraploids, respectively. This is the first time reported producing a viable diploid homozygous YY fish with unreduced diploid sperm of the autotetraploid fish, which were derived from distant hybridization. These results will not only help explaining the sex determination mechanism in teleost fish, but also play a significant role in genetic breeding in aquaculture.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Unspecified 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2015.
All research outputs
#19,942,887
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomic Data
#786
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,815
of 278,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomic Data
#29
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,342 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.