You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shift work, long working hours and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00420-014-0934-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. J. G. J. van Melick, M. D. M. van Beukering, B. W. Mol, M. H. W. Frings-Dresen, C. T. J. Hulshof |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 23% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 73% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Psychology | 5 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2020.
All research outputs
#1,834,941
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#73
of 2,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,076
of 238,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health
#3
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,153 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.