Cardiac tachyarrhythmias and patient values and preferences for their management: the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) consensus document endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and Sociedad Latinoamericana de Estimulación Cardíaca y Electrofisiología (SOLEACE)
Deirdre A. Lane, Luis Aguinaga, Carina Blomström-Lundqvist, Giuseppe Boriani, Gheorge-Andrei Dan, Mellanie True Hills, Elaine M. Hylek, Stephen A. LaHaye, Gregory Y.H. Lip, Trudie Lobban, John Mandrola, Pamela J. McCabe, Susanne S. Pedersen, Ron Pisters, Simon Stewart, Kathryn Wood, Tatjana S. Potpara, Document Reviewers, Bulent Gorenek, Jamie Beth Conti, Roberto Keegan, Suzannah Power, Jeroen Hendriks, Philippe Ritter, Hugh Calkins, Francesco Violi, Jodie Hurwitz
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2017.
All research outputs
#857,360
of 26,150,873 outputs
Outputs from Europace
#115
of 3,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,631
of 279,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Europace
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,150,873 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,178 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
