You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of Networks for Body Plan Patterning; Interplay of Modularity, Robustness and Evolvability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsten H. ten Tusscher, Paulien Hogeweg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Nepal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 159 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 27% |
| Researcher | 33 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 95 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 7% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,113,100
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,286
of 9,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,178
of 148,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#82
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,035 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.