↓ Skip to main content

Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society

Overview of attention for article published in Carcinogenesis, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes of genome instability: the effect of low dose chemical exposures in modern society
Published in
Carcinogenesis, June 2015
DOI 10.1093/carcin/bgv031
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabine A S Langie, Gudrun Koppen, Daniel Desaulniers, Fahd Al-Mulla, Rabeah Al-Temaimi, Amedeo Amedei, Amaya Azqueta, William H Bisson, Dustin G Brown, Gunnar Brunborg, Amelia K Charles, Tao Chen, Annamaria Colacci, Firouz Darroudi, Stefano Forte, Laetitia Gonzalez, Roslida A Hamid, Lisbeth E Knudsen, Luc Leyns, Adela Lopez de Cerain Salsamendi, Lorenzo Memeo, Chiara Mondello, Carmel Mothersill, Ann-Karin Olsen, Sofia Pavanello, Jayadev Raju, Emilio Rojas, Rabindra Roy, Elizabeth P Ryan, Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman, Hosni K Salem, A Ivana Scovassi, Neetu Singh, Monica Vaccari, Frederik J Van Schooten, Mahara Valverde, Jordan Woodrick, Luoping Zhang, Nik van Larebeke, Micheline Kirsch-Volders, Andrew R Collins

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 344 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Master 48 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 53 15%
Unknown 87 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 80 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 12%
Environmental Science 19 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 3%
Other 37 11%
Unknown 103 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#1,759,137
of 26,132,653 outputs
Outputs from Carcinogenesis
#125
of 4,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,932
of 279,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carcinogenesis
#3
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,132,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,927 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,768 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.