You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of the genes flanking xabB: a methyltransferase gene is involved in albicidin biosynthesis in Xanthomonas albilineans
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gene, September 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0378-1119(00)00320-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guozhong Huang, Lianhui Zhang, Robert G. Birch |
| Abstract |
Transposon mutagenesis and complementation studies previously identified a gene (xabB) for a large (526kDa) polyketide-peptide synthase required for biosynthesis of albicidin antibiotics and phytotoxins in the sugarcane leaf scald pathogen Xanthomonas albilineans. A cistron immediately downstream from xabB encodes a polypeptide of 343aa containing three conserved motifs characteristic of a family of S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM)-dependent O-methyltransferases. Insertional mutagenesis and complementation indicate that the product of this cistron (designated xabC) is essential for albicidin production, and that there is no other required downstream cistron. The xabB promoter region is bidirectional, and insertional mutagenesis of the first open reading frame (ORF) in the divergent gene also blocks albicidin biosynthesis. This divergent ORF (designated thp) encodes a protein of 239aa displaying high similarity to several IS21-like transposition helper proteins. The thp cistron is not located in a recognizable transposon, and is probably a remnant from a past transposition event that may have contributed to the development of the albicidin biosynthetic gene cluster. Failure of 'in trans' complementation of thp indicates that a downstream cistron transcribed with thp is required for albicidin biosynthesis. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
| Researcher | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2009.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Gene
#3,257
of 10,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,948
of 37,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gene
#29
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.