↓ Skip to main content

Explaining the Imperfection of the Molecular Clock of Hominid Mitochondria

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Explaining the Imperfection of the Molecular Clock of Hominid Mitochondria
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008260
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eva-Liis Loogväli, Toomas Kivisild, Tõnu Margus, Richard Villems

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 7%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 2 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 87 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Professor 9 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 29 27%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 11%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 11 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,063,436
of 25,345,468 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#37,896
of 219,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,461
of 175,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#141
of 629 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,345,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 629 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.