You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Guidelines for incorporating scientific knowledge and practice on rare diseases into higher education: neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses as a model disorder
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA), June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.06.018 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Inés Adriana Cismondi, Romina Kohan, Heather Adams, Mike Bond, Rachel Brown, Jonathan D. Cooper, Perla K. de Hidalgo, Sophia-Martha Kleine Holthaus, Sara E. Mole, Julia Mugnaini, Ana María Oller de Ramirez, Favio Pesaola, Gisela Rautenberg, Frances M. Platt, Inés Noher de Halac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 2 | 2% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 81 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 12 | 14% |
Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 27% |
Unknown | 17 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 14% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Other | 23 | 27% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2015.
All research outputs
#16,689,742
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#17,344
of 19,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,982
of 281,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)
#138
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19,867 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.