↓ Skip to main content

Implementing collaborative care programs for psychiatric disorders in medical settings: a practical guide

Overview of attention for article published in General Hospital Psychiatry, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Implementing collaborative care programs for psychiatric disorders in medical settings: a practical guide
Published in
General Hospital Psychiatry, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.06.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Scott R. Beach, Jane Walker, Christopher M. Celano, Carol A. Mastromauro, Michael Sharpe, Jeff C. Huffman

Abstract

Collaborative care is a systematic, team-based approach to the management of depression and other psychiatric disorders in medical settings. Collaborative care has been found to be effective and cost-effective, but there is little information to guide its implementation in clinical care. The objective of this article is to provide a practical guide to the implementation of collaborative care programs in real-world settings. Based on our experience delivering collaborative care programs, we provide (a) specific, stepwise recommendations for the successful implementation of collaborative care in outpatient settings and (b) an examination of the additional benefits and challenges of collaborative care programs that begin during hospitalization. The implementation of collaborative care requires senior buy-in, an effective team, clear treatment components, engaged clinicians, procedures to ensure quality and adequate infrastructure. Beginning these programs with hospitalized patients may offer additional advantages but also requires additional flexibility to adapt to the inpatient setting. A systematic approach to the development and implementation of collaborative care programs may allow clinicians to effectively and efficiently treat psychiatric illness in medical populations in both inpatient and outpatient settings.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Colombia 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Unspecified 4 14%
Other 3 11%
Librarian 3 11%
Other 8 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Psychology 6 21%
Unspecified 5 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 2 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,643,837
of 12,232,438 outputs
Outputs from General Hospital Psychiatry
#696
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,283
of 237,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Hospital Psychiatry
#21
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,232,438 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.