↓ Skip to main content

Homeosis in a scorpion supports a telopodal origin of pectines and components of the book lungs

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homeosis in a scorpion supports a telopodal origin of pectines and components of the book lungs
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, May 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12862-018-1188-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiyong Di, Gregory D. Edgecombe, Prashant P. Sharma

Abstract

The morphological and functional evolution of appendages has played a key role in the diversification of arthropods. While the ancestral arthropod appendage is held to be polyramous, terrestriality is associated with the reduction or loss of appendage rami, which may obscure the homology of different appendage derivatives. Proxies for appendage homology have included surveys of cross-reactive antibodies for wing markers like Nubbin/PDM, which have suggested that the abdominal appendages of arachnids (e.g., book lungs, tracheal tubules) are derived from ancestral gills (epipods). Here, we discovered a rare case of inferred homeosis in a scorpion in which the bilobed genital opercula and the pectines are transformed to walking legs, and an abnormal sternite shows a book lung close to an everted structure comparable to the morphology of some Palaeozoic scorpion fossils. The observed morphology is consistent with abnormal expression of homeotic genes during embryonic development. The phenotype of this abnormal specimen suggests that the genital opercula, the pectines, and parts of the book lung may be derived from the telopodite of abdominal appendages rather than from epipods. This interpretation contradicts the "ancestral gill" hypothesis but reconciles features of the Palaeozoic scorpion fossil record with the embryology of modern scorpions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 20%
Student > Bachelor 3 15%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Unknown 3 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,195,765
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#552
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,052
of 344,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.