↓ Skip to main content

Applying label-free dynamic mass redistribution technology to frame signaling of G protein–coupled receptors noninvasively in living cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Protocols, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
149 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying label-free dynamic mass redistribution technology to frame signaling of G protein–coupled receptors noninvasively in living cells
Published in
Nature Protocols, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nprot.2011.386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ralf Schröder, Johannes Schmidt, Stefanie Blättermann, Lucas Peters, Nicole Janssen, Manuel Grundmann, Wiebke Seemann, Dorina Kaufel, Nicole Merten, Christel Drewke, Jesus Gomeza, Graeme Milligan, Klaus Mohr, Evi Kostenis

Abstract

Label-free dynamic mass redistribution (DMR) is a cutting-edge assay technology that enables real-time detection of integrated cellular responses in living cells. It relies on detection of refractive index alterations on biosensor-coated microplates that originate from stimulus-induced changes in the total biomass proximal to the sensor surface. Here we describe a detailed protocol to apply DMR technology to frame functional behavior of G protein-coupled receptors that are traditionally examined with end point assays on the basis of detection of individual second messengers, such as cAMP, Ca(2+) or inositol phosphates. The method can be readily adapted across diverse cellular backgrounds (adherent or suspension), including primary human cells. Real-time recordings can be performed in 384-well microtiter plates and be completed in 2 h, or they can be extended to several hours depending on the biological question to be addressed. The entire procedure, including cell harvesting and DMR detection, takes 1-2 d.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 168 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 26%
Researcher 36 21%
Student > Master 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 24 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 14%
Chemistry 18 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 31 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,072,136
of 22,867,327 outputs
Outputs from Nature Protocols
#1,355
of 2,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,441
of 139,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Protocols
#13
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,867,327 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,738 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.