You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Investigating factors influencing consumer willingness to buy GM food and nano-food
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-015-3084-4 |
| Authors |
Chengyan Yue, Shuoli Zhao, Christopher Cummings, Jennifer Kuzma |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 35 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 15 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,262,688
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#14
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,636
of 264,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.