Title |
Eye-like ocelloids are built from different endosymbiotically acquired components
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature14593 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gregory S. Gavelis, Shiho Hayakawa, Richard A. White III, Takashi Gojobori, Curtis A. Suttle, Patrick J. Keeling, Brian S. Leander |
Abstract |
Multicellularity is often considered a prerequisite for morphological complexity, as seen in the camera-type eyes found in several groups of animals. A notable exception exists in single-celled eukaryotes called dinoflagellates, some of which have an eye-like 'ocelloid' consisting of subcellular analogues to a cornea, lens, iris, and retina. These planktonic cells are uncultivated and rarely encountered in environmental samples, obscuring the function and evolutionary origin of the ocelloid. Here we show, using a combination of electron microscopy, tomography, isolated-organelle genomics, and single-cell genomics, that ocelloids are built from pre-existing organelles, including a cornea-like layer made of mitochondria and a retinal body made of anastomosing plastids. We find that the retinal body forms the central core of a network of peridinin-type plastids, which in dinoflagellates and their relatives originated through an ancient endosymbiosis with a red alga. As such, the ocelloid is a chimaeric structure, incorporating organelles with different endosymbiotic histories. The anatomical complexity of single-celled organisms may be limited by the components available for differentiation, but the ocelloid shows that pre-existing organelles can be assembled into a structure so complex that it was initially mistaken for a multicellular eye. Although mitochondria and plastids are acknowledged chiefly for their metabolic roles, they can also be building blocks for greater structural complexity. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 124 | 17% |
United States | 64 | 9% |
United Kingdom | 19 | 3% |
Germany | 13 | 2% |
France | 9 | 1% |
Canada | 8 | 1% |
Switzerland | 7 | <1% |
Sweden | 6 | <1% |
Spain | 4 | <1% |
Other | 46 | 6% |
Unknown | 413 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 573 | 80% |
Scientists | 120 | 17% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 2% |
Germany | 3 | 1% |
France | 3 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
Czechia | 3 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Other | 3 | 1% |
Unknown | 268 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 70 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 56 | 19% |
Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 7% |
Other | 54 | 18% |
Unknown | 29 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 129 | 44% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 15% |
Environmental Science | 15 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 14 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 4% |
Other | 42 | 14% |
Unknown | 39 | 13% |