↓ Skip to main content

Refinement of 1p36 Alterations Not Involving PRDM16 in Myeloid and Lymphoid Malignancies

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Refinement of 1p36 Alterations Not Involving PRDM16 in Myeloid and Lymphoid Malignancies
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0026311
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francois P. Duhoux, Geneviève Ameye, Virginie Lambot, Christian Herens, Frédéric Lambert, Sophie Raynaud, Iwona Wlodarska, Lucienne Michaux, Catherine Roche-Lestienne, Elise Labis, Sylvie Taviaux, Elise Chapiro, Florence Nguyen Khac, Stéphanie Struski, Sophie Dobbelstein, Nicole Dastugue, Eric Lippert, Frank Speleman, Nadine Van Roy, An De Weer, Katrina Rack, Pascaline Talmant, Steven Richebourg, Francine Mugneret, Isabelle Tigaud, Marie-Joëlle Mozziconacci, Sophy Laibe, Nathalie Nadal, Christine Terré, Jeanne-Marie Libouton, Anabelle Decottignies, Miikka Vikkula, Hélène A. Poirel

Abstract

Fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed to characterize 81 cases of myeloid and lymphoid malignancies with cytogenetic 1p36 alterations not affecting the PRDM16 locus. In total, three subgroups were identified: balanced translocations (N = 27) and telomeric rearrangements (N = 15), both mainly observed in myeloid disorders; and unbalanced non-telomeric rearrangements (N = 39), mainly observed in lymphoid proliferations and frequently associated with a highly complex karyotype. The 1p36 rearrangement was isolated in 12 cases, mainly myeloid disorders. The breakpoints on 1p36 were more widely distributed than previously reported, but with identifiable rare breakpoint cluster regions, such as the TP73 locus. We also found novel partner loci on 1p36 for the known multi-partner genes HMGA2 and RUNX1. We precised the common terminal 1p36 deletion, which has been suggested to have an adverse prognosis, in B-cell lymphomas [follicular lymphomas and diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with t(14;18)(q32;q21) as well as follicular lymphomas without t(14;18)]. Intrachromosomal telomeric repetitive sequences were detected in at least half the cases of telomeric rearrangements. It is unclear how the latter rearrangements occurred and whether they represent oncogenic events or result from chromosomal instability during oncogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 5 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2011.
All research outputs
#15,237,301
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#129,737
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,744
of 139,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,671
of 2,586 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,586 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.