↓ Skip to main content

High-Resolution Comparative Genomic Hybridization of Inflammatory Breast Cancer and Identification of Candidate Genes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High-Resolution Comparative Genomic Hybridization of Inflammatory Breast Cancer and Identification of Candidate Genes
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0016950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ismahane Bekhouche, Pascal Finetti, José Adelaïde, Anthony Ferrari, Carole Tarpin, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Colette Charpin, Gilles Houvenaeghel, Jocelyne Jacquemier, Ghislain Bidaut, Daniel Birnbaum, Patrice Viens, Max Chaffanet, François Bertucci

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Norway 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Professor 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 16%
Chemistry 3 6%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,747,380
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,317
of 195,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,289
of 184,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#407
of 1,259 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,259 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.