You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Interspinous Spacer versus Traditional Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0097142 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ai-Min Wu, Yong Zhou, Qing-Long Li, Xin-Lei Wu, Yong-Long Jin, Peng Luo, Yong-Long Chi, Xiang-Yang Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 1 | 1% |
United States | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 10 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
Researcher | 10 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 12% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Other | 18 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 48% |
Sports and Recreations | 4 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 25 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,734
of 196,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,684
of 228,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,890
of 4,750 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,750 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.