↓ Skip to main content

Causes of interruption of bevacizumab therapy in age-related macular degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Causes of interruption of bevacizumab therapy in age-related macular degeneration
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia, April 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0004-27492010000200009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Renata Portella Nunes, Mário Junqueira Nóbrega, Fernando José De Novelli, Samuel Ângelo Coral, Thais Bacha Berti, Marina Maria Drumm Missen, Marina Canuto Correa

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#52
of 446 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,293
of 103,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Oftalmologia
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 446 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them