↓ Skip to main content

Edoxaban in the Evolving Scenario of Non Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Imputed Placebo Analysis and Multiple Treatment Comparisons

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Edoxaban in the Evolving Scenario of Non Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Imputed Placebo Analysis and Multiple Treatment Comparisons
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0100478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Verdecchia, Fabio Angeli, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Gianpaolo Reboldi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Unknown 80 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Other 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 19 23%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 52%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 4%
Unspecified 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 20 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,734
of 196,707 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,223
of 228,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,715
of 4,454 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,707 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,454 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.