↓ Skip to main content

Intravenous magnesium for acute myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravenous magnesium for acute myocardial infarction
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd002755.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jing Li, Qing Zhang, Mingming Zhang, Matthias Egger

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 57 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 3%
Lecturer 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2019.
All research outputs
#10,719,611
of 13,472,087 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,645
of 10,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,045
of 270,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#167
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,472,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.