↓ Skip to main content

Salmon Gill Poxvirus, the Deepest Representative of the Chordopoxvirinae

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Virology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Salmon Gill Poxvirus, the Deepest Representative of the Chordopoxvirinae
Published in
Journal of Virology, July 2015
DOI 10.1128/jvi.01174-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mona C. Gjessing, Natalya Yutin, Torstein Tengs, Tania Senkevich, Eugene Koonin, Hans Petter Rønning, Marta Alarcon, Sonja Ylving, Kai-Inge Lie, Britt Saure, Linh Tran, Bernard Moss, Ole Bendik Dale

Abstract

Poxviruses are large DNA viruses of vertebrates and insects causing disease in many animal species including reptiles, birds and mammals. Although poxvirus-like particles were detected in diseased farmed koi carp, ayu and Atlantic salmon, their genetic relationships to poxviruses were not established. Here, we provide the first genome sequence of a fish poxvirus, which was isolated from farmed Atlantic salmon, and use qPCR and immunohistochemistry to describe aspects of salmon gill poxvirus disease. The gill was the main target organ where immature and mature poxvirus particles were detected in detaching, apoptotic respiratory epithelial cells, preceding clinical disease in the form of lethargy, respiratory distress and mortality. In moribund salmon blocking of gas exchange would likely be caused by adherence of respiratory lamellae and epithelial proliferation obstructing respiratory surfaces. The virus was not found in healthy salmon or in controls of gill disease without apoptotic cells, although transmission remains to be demonstrated. PCR on archival tissue confirmed virus infection in 14 cases with gill apoptosis in Norway starting from 1995. Phylogenomic analyses showed that the fish poxvirus is the deepest available branch of chordopoxviruses. The virus encompasses most key chordopoxvirus genes that are required for genome replication and expression although the gene order is substantially different. Nevertheless, many highly conserved chordopoxvirus genes involved in viral membranes biogenesis or virus-host interactions are missing. Instead, the salmon poxvirus carries numerous genes encoding unknown proteins many of which have low sequence complexity and contain simple repeats suggestive of intrinsic disorder or distinct protein structures. Aquaculture is an increasingly important global source of high quality food. To sustain this growth, disease control in fish farming is essential. Moreover, the spread of disease from farmed fish to wild life is a concern. Serious poxviral diseases are emerging in aquaculture, but very little is known about the viruses and the diseases they cause. There is a possibility that viruses may spread to new species with enhanced virulence as has occurred with the myxoma poxvirus in rabbits. Provision of the first fish poxvirus genome sequence and specific diagnostics for the salmon gill poxvirus in Atlantic salmon may help curb this disease and provide comparative knowledge. Furthermore, because salmon gill poxvirus represents the deepest branch of chordopoxvirus so far discovered, the genome analysis provided substantial insight into the evolution of different functional modules in this important group of viruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 105 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 18%
Other 10 9%
Student > Master 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 32 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,237,541
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Virology
#542
of 25,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,932
of 277,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Virology
#13
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.