You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Four Regional Marine Biodiversity Studies: Approaches and Contributions to Ecosystem-Based Management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018997 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara L. Ellis, Lewis S. Incze, Peter Lawton, Henn Ojaveer, Brian R. MacKenzie, C. Roland Pitcher, Thomas C. Shirley, Margit Eero, John W. Tunnell, Peter J. Doherty, Brad M. Zeller |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 4% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 39 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,242,460
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#74,546
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,465
of 110,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#611
of 1,503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.