↓ Skip to main content

State of Knowledge of Coastal and Marine Biodiversity of Indian Ocean Countries

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
State of Knowledge of Coastal and Marine Biodiversity of Indian Ocean Countries
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0014613
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohideen Wafar, Krishnamurthy Venkataraman, Baban Ingole, Syed Ajmal Khan, Ponnapakkam LokaBharathi

Abstract

The Indian Ocean (IO) extends over 30% of the global ocean area and is rimmed by 36 littoral and 11 hinterland nations sustaining about 30% of the world's population. The landlocked character of the ocean along its northern boundary and the resultant seasonally reversing wind and sea surface circulation patterns are features unique to the IO. The IO also accounts for 30% of the global coral reef cover, 40,000 km² of mangroves,some of the world's largest estuaries, and 9 large marine ecosystems. Numerous expeditions and institutional efforts in the last two centuries have contributed greatly to our knowledge of coastal and marine biodiversity within the IO. The current inventory, as seen from the Ocean Biogeographic Information System, stands at 34,989 species, but the status of knowledge is not uniform among countries. Lack of human, institutional, and technical capabilities in some IO countries is the main cause for the heterogeneous level of growth in our understanding of the biodiversity of the IO. The gaps in knowledge extend to several smaller taxa and to large parts of the shelf and deep-sea ecosystems, including seamounts. Habitat loss, uncontrolled developmental activities in the coastal zone, over extraction of resources, and coastal pollution are serious constraints on maintenance of highly diverse biota, especially in countries like those of the IO, where environmental regulations are weak.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 2 <1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
India 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
United Arab Emirates 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 244 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 63 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 22%
Student > Master 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 13 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 45 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 38%
Environmental Science 63 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 14 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 4%
Social Sciences 7 3%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,917,449
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,752
of 193,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,184
of 182,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#277
of 1,256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.