↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of catastrophisation in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness of cognitive behaviour therapy for the treatment of catastrophisation in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/ar3496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marta Alda, Juan V Luciano, Eva Andrés, Antoni Serrano-Blanco, Baltasar Rodero, Yolanda López del Hoyo, Miquel Roca, Sergio Moreno, Rosa Magallón, Javier García-Campayo

Abstract

No randomised, controlled trials have been conducted to date on the efficacy of psychological and pharmacological treatments of pain catastrophising (PC) in patients with fibromyalgia. Our aim in this study was to assess the effectiveness of cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) and the recommended pharmacological treatment (RPT) compared with treatment as usual (TAU) at the primary care level for the treatment of PC in fibromyalgia patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 17%
Researcher 27 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 30 17%
Unknown 36 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 36 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,609,661
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#517
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,456
of 152,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#4
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.