↓ Skip to main content

Differences in affinity of monoclonal and naturally acquired polyclonal antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Microbiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differences in affinity of monoclonal and naturally acquired polyclonal antibodies against Plasmodium falciparum merozoite antigens
Published in
BMC Microbiology, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12866-015-0461-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sreenivasulu B. Reddy, Robin F. Anders, Nadia Cross, Ivo Mueller, Nicolas Senn, Danielle I. Stanisic, Peter M. Siba, Mats Wahlgren, Fred Kironde, James G. Beeson, Kristina E.M. Persson

Abstract

Malaria is a major global cause of deaths and a vaccine is urgently needed. We have employed the P. falciparum merozoite antigens MSP2-3D7/FC27 and AMA1, used them in ELISA, and coupled them in different ways using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and estimated affinity (measured as kd) of monoclonal as well as naturally-acquired polyclonal antibodies in human plasma. There were major differences in kd depending on how the antigens were immobilized and where the His-tag was placed. For AMA1 we could see correlations with invasion inhibition. Using different immobilizations of proteins in SPR, we could see only moderate correlations with levels of antibodies in ELISA, indicating that in ELISA the proteins were not uniformly bound and that antibodies with many specificities exist in natural immunisation. The correlations between ELISA and SPR were enhanced when only parasite positive samples were included, which may indicate that high affinity antibodies are difficult to maintain over long periods of time. We found higher kd values for MSP2 (indicating lower affinity) compared to AMA1, which might be partly explained by MSP2 being an intrinsically disordered protein, while AMA1 is globular. For future vaccine studies and for understanding immunity, it is important to consider how to present proteins to the immune system to achieve highest antibody affinities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 62 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 17%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Chemistry 4 6%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,345,259
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Microbiology
#2,050
of 3,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,582
of 264,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Microbiology
#30
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.