↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous regression of cancer: New insights

Overview of attention for article published in Biotherapy, January 1992
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spontaneous regression of cancer: New insights
Published in
Biotherapy, January 1992
DOI 10.1007/bf02171706
Pubmed ID
Authors

Basil A. Stoll

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 33%
Other 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 22%
Unknown 3 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#7,564,023
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Biotherapy
#27
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,606
of 62,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotherapy
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them