↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Modeling of Transcription Factor Binding Affinities Predicts Regulatory Interactions

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Modeling of Transcription Factor Binding Affinities Predicts Regulatory Interactions
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Manke, Helge G. Roider, Martin Vingron

Abstract

Recent experimental and theoretical efforts have highlighted the fact that binding of transcription factors to DNA can be more accurately described by continuous measures of their binding affinities, rather than a discrete description in terms of binding sites. While the binding affinities can be predicted from a physical model, it is often desirable to know the distribution of binding affinities for specific sequence backgrounds. In this paper, we present a statistical approach to derive the exact distribution for sequence models with fixed GC content. We demonstrate that the affinity distribution of almost all known transcription factors can be effectively parametrized by a class of generalized extreme value distributions. Moreover, this parameterization also describes the affinity distribution for sequence backgrounds with variable GC content, such as human promoter sequences. Our approach is applicable to arbitrary sequences and all transcription factors with known binding preferences that can be described in terms of a motif matrix. The statistical treatment also provides a proper framework to directly compare transcription factors with very different affinity distributions. This is illustrated by our analysis of human promoters with known binding sites, for many of which we could identify the known regulators as those with the highest affinity. The combination of physical model and statistical normalization provides a quantitative measure which ranks transcription factors for a given sequence, and which can be compared directly with large-scale binding data. Its successful application to human promoter sequences serves as an encouraging example of how the method can be applied to other sequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
Germany 5 4%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 122 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 16 12%
Professor 8 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 68 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 16%
Computer Science 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Mathematics 4 3%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 14 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2014.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,683
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,232
of 97,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#27
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.