You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rapid Mutation of Endogenous Zebrafish Genes Using Zinc Finger Nucleases Made by Oligomerized Pool ENgineering (OPEN)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004348 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan E. Foley, Jing-Ruey J. Yeh, Morgan L. Maeder, Deepak Reyon, Jeffry D. Sander, Randall T. Peterson, J. Keith Joung |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 238 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 3% |
| Portugal | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 214 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 67 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 24% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 23 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 138 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 38 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 12 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,755,938
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#95,601
of 201,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,826
of 174,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#333
of 530 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,789 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,341 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 530 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.