↓ Skip to main content

Functional outcome in older adults with joint pain and comorbidity: design of a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Functional outcome in older adults with joint pain and comorbidity: design of a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-241
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lotte AH Hermsen, Stephanie S Leone, Daniëlle AWM van der Windt, Martin Smalbrugge, Joost Dekker, Henriëtte E van der Horst

Abstract

Joint pain is a highly prevalent condition in the older population. Only a minority of the older adults consult the general practitioner for joint pain, and during consultation joint pain is often poorly recognized and treated, especially when other co-existing chronic conditions are involved. Therefore, older adults with joint pain and comorbidity may have a higher risk of poor functional outcome and decreased quality of life (QoL), and possibly need more attention in primary care. The main purpose of the study is to explore functioning in older adults with joint pain and comorbidity, in terms of mobility, functional independence and participation and to identify possible predictors of poor functional outcome. The study will also identify predictors of decreased QoL. The results will be used to develop prediction models for the early identification of subgroups at high risk of poor functional outcome and decreased QoL. This may contribute to better targeting of treatment and to more effective health care in this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 105 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Psychology 4 4%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 40 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2011.
All research outputs
#12,558,792
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,641
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,599
of 140,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#27
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 140,299 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.