↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive Biostatistical Analysis of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer Using a Large Population-Based Sample

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
269 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive Biostatistical Analysis of CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer Using a Large Population-Based Sample
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003698
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katsuhiko Nosho, Natsumi Irahara, Kaori Shima, Shoko Kure, Gregory J. Kirkner, Eva S. Schernhammer, Aditi Hazra, David J. Hunter, John Quackenbush, Donna Spiegelman, Edward L. Giovannucci, Charles S. Fuchs, Shuji Ogino

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 129 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 18%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 1%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 19 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,564,477
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#90,800
of 196,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,548
of 89,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#229
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.