You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Sporadic ALS: blame it on the editor
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Medicine, April 2004
|
DOI | 10.1038/nm0404-347 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stuart A Lipton |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 6% |
Brazil | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor | 4 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 41% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 35% |
Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2020.
All research outputs
#1,911,717
of 23,075,872 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#3,314
of 8,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,566
of 58,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#10
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,075,872 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 98.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.