You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing Platforms for C. elegans Mutant Identification Using High-Throughput Whole-Genome Sequencing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004012 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yufeng Shen, Sumeet Sarin, Ye Liu, Oliver Hobert, Itsik Pe'er |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 153 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 57 | 32% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 22% |
| Professor | 18 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 15 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 102 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,616,848
of 23,221,875 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#92,230
of 198,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,269
of 170,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#273
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,221,875 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.