You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ocean Calamities: Delineating the Boundaries between Scientific Evidence and Belief
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BioScience, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/biosci/biv088 |
| Authors |
Carlos M. Duarte, Robinson W. Fulweiler, Catherine E. Lovelock, John M. Pandolfi, Paulina Martinetto, Megan I. Saunders, Stefan Gelcich |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 29% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,555,242
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BioScience
#925
of 2,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,410
of 276,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioScience
#10
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.