You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
El universalismo en salud en Argentina entre 2003 y 2015: balances y desafíos desde una aproximación macroinstitucional
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Salud colectiva, December 2017
|
| DOI | 10.18294/sc.2017.1312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Magdalena Chiara, María Crojethovic, Ana Ariovich |
| Abstract |
Debates about universalism in health have been gaining ground in Latin America and have entered the policy agenda with differing results. Notwithstanding the country's federalism, the most profound changes that took place in Argentina in the last decade occurred in the arena of national politics. Based on the theoretical contributions of historical neo-institutionalism and implementation studies, this paper aims to analyze, from a macro institutional approach, the scope of the national policy regarding health universalization. This descriptive study is based on secondary sources and the review of research results on the implementation of the programs Remediar, Sumar and Plan Nacer in relation to four variables: coverage, access, sets of benefits and rights included in the policy. Given the characteristics of the Argentine institutional matrix, program implementation in subnational scenarios can be expected to confront complex and heterogeneous terrain in which the programs acquire new meanings with respect to the goal of universality that each poses. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 36% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#15,989,045
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Salud colectiva
#124
of 265 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,935
of 443,583 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Salud colectiva
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 265 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,583 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.