You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Increased Productivity of a Cover Crop Mixture Is Not Associated with Enhanced Agroecosystem Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0097351 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Richard G. Smith, Lesley W. Atwood, Nicholas D. Warren |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 191 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 21% |
| Researcher | 34 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 35 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 115 | 58% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Unknown | 42 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2016.
All research outputs
#2,701,189
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,487
of 194,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,279
of 226,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#772
of 4,636 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,495 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,636 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.