You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Why CCR2 and CCR5 Blockade Failed and Why CCR1 Blockade Might Still Be Effective in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021772 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria C. Lebre, Clarissa E. Vergunst, Ivy Y. K. Choi, Saïda Aarrass, Ana S. F. Oliveira, Tim Wyant, Richard Horuk, Kris A. Reedquist, Paul P. Tak |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 23 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,771,811
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#66,122
of 196,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,005
of 116,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#621
of 2,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.