↓ Skip to main content

Cascaded failures in weighted networks

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
143 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cascaded failures in weighted networks
Published in
Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, October 2011
DOI 10.1103/physreve.84.046114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Mahmoudreza Babaei, Jalili, MohammadAli Safari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Italy 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Slovenia 1 2%
Unknown 57 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 27%
Student > Master 12 19%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 18 28%
Computer Science 9 14%
Physics and Astronomy 8 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2011.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#3,604
of 20,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,828
of 152,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#31
of 207 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,986 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 207 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.