↓ Skip to main content

Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of Network Structure and Cellular Response on Spike Time Correlations
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, March 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002408
Pubmed ID
Authors

James Trousdale, Yu Hu, Eric Shea-Brown, Krešimir Josić

Abstract

Novel experimental techniques reveal the simultaneous activity of larger and larger numbers of neurons. As a result there is increasing interest in the structure of cooperative--or correlated--activity in neural populations, and in the possible impact of such correlations on the neural code. A fundamental theoretical challenge is to understand how the architecture of network connectivity along with the dynamical properties of single cells shape the magnitude and timescale of correlations. We provide a general approach to this problem by extending prior techniques based on linear response theory. We consider networks of general integrate-and-fire cells with arbitrary architecture, and provide explicit expressions for the approximate cross-correlation between constituent cells. These correlations depend strongly on the operating point (input mean and variance) of the neurons, even when connectivity is fixed. Moreover, the approximations admit an expansion in powers of the matrices that describe the network architecture. This expansion can be readily interpreted in terms of paths between different cells. We apply our results to large excitatory-inhibitory networks, and demonstrate first how precise balance--or lack thereof--between the strengths and timescales of excitatory and inhibitory synapses is reflected in the overall correlation structure of the network. We then derive explicit expressions for the average correlation structure in randomly connected networks. These expressions help to identify the important factors that shape coordinated neural activity in such networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 5 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 145 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 36%
Researcher 37 23%
Student > Master 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 29%
Neuroscience 34 21%
Physics and Astronomy 25 16%
Mathematics 12 8%
Engineering 8 5%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 22 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,345,315
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,027
of 9,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,071
of 173,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#66
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.