You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Euscelis incisus(Cicadellidae, Deltocephalinae), a natural vector of 16SrIII-B phytoplasma causing multiple inflorescence disease ofCirsium arvense
Annals of Applied Biology, July 2015
M. Jakovljević, J. Jović, M. Mitrović, O. Krstić, A. Kosovac, I. Toševski, T. Cvrković
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||8%|
|Student > Master||1||8%|
|Professor > Associate Professor||1||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||7||54%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||8%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||8%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Applied Biology
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 262,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Applied Biology
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.