↓ Skip to main content

Skin, thermal and umbilical cord care practices for neonates in southern, rural Zambia: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Skin, thermal and umbilical cord care practices for neonates in southern, rural Zambia: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, July 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12884-015-0584-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Sacks, William J. Moss, Peter J. Winch, Philip Thuma, Janneke H. van Dijk, Luke C. Mullany

Abstract

In Choma District, southern Zambia, the neonatal mortality rate is approximately 40 per 1000 live births and, although the rate is decreasing, many deliveries take place outside of formal facilities. Understanding local practices during the postnatal period is essential for optimizing newborn care programs. We conducted 36 in-depth interviews, five focus groups and eight observational sessions with recently-delivered women, traditional birth attendants, and clinic and hospital staff from three sites, focusing on skin, thermal and cord care practices for newborns in the home. Newborns were generally kept warm by application of hats and layers of clothing. While thermal protection is provided for preterm and small newborns, the practice of nighttime bathing with cold water was common. The vernix was considered important for the preterm newborn but dangerous for HIV-exposed infants. Mothers applied various substances to the skin and umbilical cord, with special practices for preterm infants. Applied substances included petroleum jelly, commercial baby lotion, cooking oil and breastmilk. The most common substances applied to the umbilical cord were powders made of roots, burnt gourds or ash. To ward off malevolent spirits, similar powders were reportedly placed directly into dermal incisions, especially in ill children. Thermal care for newborns is commonly practiced but co-exists with harmful practices. Locally appropriate behavior change interventions should aim to promote chlorhexidine in place of commonly-reported application of harmful substances to the skin and umbilical cord, reduce bathing of newborns at night, and address the immediate bathing of HIV-infected newborns.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Zambia 1 <1%
Unknown 231 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 19%
Student > Bachelor 32 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 9%
Researcher 13 6%
Student > Postgraduate 12 5%
Other 46 20%
Unknown 65 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 51 22%
Social Sciences 19 8%
Unspecified 7 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 71 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,418,919
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,471
of 4,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,875
of 262,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#48
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.