↓ Skip to main content

Endophenotypes in a Dynamically Connected Brain

Overview of attention for article published in Behavior Genetics, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endophenotypes in a Dynamically Connected Brain
Published in
Behavior Genetics, January 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10519-009-9330-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. J. A. Smit, M. Boersma, C. E. M. van Beijsterveldt, D. Posthuma, D. I. Boomsma, C. J. Stam, E. J. C. de Geus

Abstract

We examined the longitudinal genetic architecture of three parameters of functional brain connectivity. One parameter described overall connectivity (synchronization likelihood, SL). The two others were derived from graph theory and described local (clustering coefficient, CC) and global (average path length, L) aspects of connectivity. We measured resting state EEG in 1,438 subjects from four age groups of about 16, 18, 25 and 50 years. Developmental curves for SL and L indicate that connectivity is more random at adolescence and old age, and more structured in middle-aged adulthood. Individual variation in SL and L were moderately to highly heritable at each age (SL: 40-82%; L: 29-63%). Genetic factors underlying these phenotypes overlapped. CC was also heritable (25-49%) but showed no systematic overlap with SL and L. SL, CC, and L in the alpha band showed high phenotypic and genetic stability from 16 to 25 years. Heritability for parameters in the beta band was lower, and less stable across ages, but genetic stability was high. We conclude that the connectivity parameters SL, CC, and L in the alpha band show the hallmarks of a good endophenotype for behavior and developmental disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 5%
Netherlands 4 3%
United States 3 2%
Russia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 109 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Master 12 10%
Professor 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 18%
Neuroscience 18 15%
Psychology 17 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 12%
Engineering 5 4%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 29 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,124,659
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Behavior Genetics
#555
of 908 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,497
of 165,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavior Genetics
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 908 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.