You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ApoE isoform-dependent changes in hippocampal synaptic function
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Neurodegeneration, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-1326-4-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kimberly M Korwek, Justin H Trotter, Mary Jo LaDu, Patrick M Sullivan, Edwin J Weeber |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 69 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 13 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Psychology | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2015.
All research outputs
#4,176,961
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#508
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,033
of 111,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them