You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Overestimating Fish Counts by Non-Instantaneous Visual Censuses: Consequences for Population and Community Descriptions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011722 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christine Ward-Paige, Joanna Mills Flemming, Heike K. Lotze |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Cuba | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 248 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 17% |
| Researcher | 44 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 11% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 48 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 127 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 60 | 23% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,070,631
of 25,084,886 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,253
of 217,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,934
of 101,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#647
of 770 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,084,886 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 217,640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 770 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.