↓ Skip to main content

Preterm newborn readiness for oral feeding: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in CoDAS, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preterm newborn readiness for oral feeding: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
CoDAS, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/2317-1782/20152014104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Henriques Lima, Marcela Guimarães Côrtes, Maria Cândida Ferrarez Bouzada, Amélia Augusta de Lima Friche

Abstract

To identify and systematize the main studies on the transition from enteral to oral feeding in preterm infants. Articles that describe the transition from oral to enteral feeding in preterm infants were located in MEDLINE, LILACS, and SciELO databases. Original studies, with available abstract, published in the last 10 years were included. Analysis of the methodology and the main results of the studies, and meta-analysis of the effects of sensory-motor-oral stimulation at the time of transition to full oral feeding and duration of hospitalization were conducted. Twenty-nine national and international publications were considered. Most studies were clinical trials (44.8%) and did not use rating scales to start the transition process (82.7%). In the meta-analysis, positive effect of stimulation of the sensory-motor-oral system was observed with respect to the transition time to oral diet (p=0.0000), but not in relation to the length of hospital stay (p=0.09). However, heterogeneity between studies was found both in the analysis of the transition time to full oral feeding (I2=93.98) and in the length of hospital stay (I2=82.30). The transition to oral feeding is an important moment, and various physical and clinical characteristics of preterm infants have been used to describe this process. Despite the impossibility of generalizing the results due to the heterogeneity of the studies, we have noted the importance of strategies for stimulation of sensory-motor-oral system to decrease the period of transition to full oral feeding system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 22%
Student > Postgraduate 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 23 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 31%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 26 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2016.
All research outputs
#20,435,228
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#1
of 5 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,697
of 363,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.4. This one scored the same or higher as 4 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,795 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.