You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What are the effects of wooded riparian zones on stream temperature?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-1-3 |
| Authors |
Diana E Bowler, Rebecca Mant, Harriet Orr, David M Hannah, Andrew S Pullin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 161 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 61 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#248
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,279
of 178,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,680 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them